confidentiality might be used because of setting up and retaliation or double penalty. the truth and all the truth is a grave problem in any system of justice, included the hypothetical equity.

and on common space owns by the companies, owning the data recorded on cctv...and the way to interprete them as well as their context is more than frightening but delibitation.
though the form of action solidarity running the place without policy is militia social and if is not altogether will be.

as well if dr power could stop saying 'you know' cos people will judge and will get stuck with this rythme while there is so many stuffing in her discourse that in fact we did not know...then

also on solidarity movement and their psychology
also on solidarity movement and their psychology it is highly ugly that the solidarity appearance is high as there is no ngo organizational issues, orders, comments, epistemology and ontology questions. They are groups assemble on some unofficial occasion, they are fluids and then unleash from debates, yes but also from results and work and cohesion- as well as responsibilisation.
In addition, they are groups under who? Lead by who, yes but crush or supervise or block by who?
It d be interesting to know in front o fthe police, the power holder, the police of anywhere, none immune against becoming the Gestapo, would be solidarising long in case of a ‘prisoner dilemma context.
As and it is what I reproach you, the solidarity,that no one is taking the subject of communism, and in fact you are not communist by any means but social liquidity, is about the resources. You can have any rules of equity and justice, jury, fair trial, constitution, diplomacy, whatever filing and field of theorization if there is no more resources, only if we would have been brought up and self build up a society of pure morality, to produce in knowing that our means of production are depletion will ensure a culture and mentality of seduction, adduction, addiction, destruction and immorality. Whate veer would be the rules they would be eviction, viciated . about priviledge and for distortion theft tacit threat and felons.

the weapon of criticism cannot, of course, supplant the criticism of weapons.
weep. marx.

also not taking into account in the discourse of social is the nature of man, man centred though, without its universe, without being united and talkde in term of dissensiton, its shadow or absence, death, emptiness and impertience.